TargetProcess Product Blog - Latest Comments

Re: TargetProcess 2.22.6: Prioritization in Kanban Board

Domain registration — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:26:25 -0000

Very cool post I have read the article fully. It helped me very much.

Re: TargetProcess v.2.21.15 Released

commercial loans — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:09:35 -0000

You really have a unique way to pen down your thoughts. It is mind blowing and so informative that no one can put their eyes off from your views.

Re: TargetProcess Kanban Board: Jan 13

commercial loans — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:09:11 -0000

Nice information, I would like to appreciate your good work and also would like to encourage you to keep it up.

Re: New Bugzilla plugin in TargetProcess v.2.22.10

breast augmentation houston — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:11:35 -0000

I really like the new Bugzilla plugin. I think it's easier and fast to use for. Thanks for write-up. I'll definitely use it on my site.

Re: TargetProcess Kanban Board: Jan 13

Best Hosting — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:45:09 -0000

This project progression image is too good. Thanks for sharing.

Re: TargetProcess v2.21.2 Released

Ecommerce Software — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:44:04 -0000

u had make good post here..keep updating

Re: New Mashup: Group your Kanban boards’ Swimlanes

Jeff — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:55:48 -0000

Thanks Jonathan -- awesome help, as always from TargetProcess!

Re: New Mashup: Group your Kanban boards’ Swimlanes

Jonathan Enzinna — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:49:23 -0000

Jeff and I actually just had a live support chat about the Mashup. It should be noted that when you're setting up the configuration object, the name of your columns is case-sensitive!

Jeff was also nice enough to bring to my attention a little formatting issue that occurred when you have a "Planned" state in your workflow...this was just fixed and a new version has been added to GitHub for download.

Re: New Mashup: Group your Kanban boards’ Swimlanes

Jeff — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:59:42 -0000

This isn't working for us; we modified the config values for our workflow steps and assigned them to one of 4 swimlanes, but statuses are being put in the wrong swimlanes, and some statuses are not being put in a swimlane at all, even though they are listed in the config object as belonging to one.

Re: New Mashup: Group your Kanban boards’ Swimlanes

Michael Dubakov — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:41:05 -0000

Tim Friesen Yes, indeed. We plan to add it into Board+. It is a new TP layout that will replace all boards and lists into a unified concept.

Re: New Mashup: Group your Kanban boards’ Swimlanes

Tim Friesen — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:39:08 -0000

Seems like a nice potential feature to implement natively within the product.

Re: Enjoy Mashups management and Visual Flow in TargetProcess v.2.22.9

Michael Dubakov — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:48:19 -0000

@7759993799bf5dcb15c4c57dab7228ec We just make it available to all customers. Please note that you need .NET 4 to run v.2.22.9

Re: Enjoy Mashups management and Visual Flow in TargetProcess v.2.22.9

Andrew Matlock — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:33:58 -0000

How is the on-site package coming? I'm really looking forward to the visual flow and its ability to help us identify and fix process problems.

Re: TargetProcess Kanban Board: Jan 13

Rayashman — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:51:47 -0000

I really like the visual aspect of TargetProcess. All too often, in other tools, you have to wade through endless lists and link just to move a story state and then appreciate its effect on the project. Using boards in this way we can quickly drag-drop to update stories/tasks/test cases.... and see exactly what is happening with our project.

Re: Enjoy Mashups management and Visual Flow in TargetProcess v.2.22.9

Michael Dubakov — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:34:59 -0000

@bac75dd21dc6118aca2367528bd30c94 On our servers we can quickly fix the problem or even revert to an older build in case of problems. For OnSite customers it is obviously harder to do. And this particular release demands .NET 4, so we are testing problems with installation and upgrades.

Re: Enjoy Mashups management and Visual Flow in TargetProcess v.2.22.9

Tommy Christensen — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:32:01 -0000

How come you are releasing to your own servers before making this available to on-site users?

Re: TargetProcess Kanban Board: Jan 13

Michael Dubakov — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 07:34:11 -0000

@66fc33d259df37b17198d0d76e0ac169 What do you mean by up and running?

Re: TargetProcess Kanban Board: Jan 13

Radek Simko — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:40:21 -0000

When this will be up and running?

Re: 2 of our servers are down since 1 AM EST

Ilja Vishnevski — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:44:39 -0000

I'm really glad everything is back on and thank you for updating us in this post. Let's hope nothing similar happens in the future, but just in case: I would really appreciate to be informed via email about 8 hours earlier than it eventually happened.

We are still evaluating TP, but since we really like many of its features, we are on track of becoming customers. As a customer, I expect to be informed right away in case of such an outage. In fact, it hit us quite hard, since our sprint planning meeting was scheduled for yesterday, and as we planned to apply TP in the next sprint, we added all new stories in TP and unfortunately were not careful enough to make a backup.

Re: 2 of our servers are down since 1 AM EST

Flavio Carmo — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:30:31 -0000

We use Softlayer (3+ years) for dedicated and virtual server. They have a good team and low downtimes to maintenance.

Re: Blue Builds

Michael Dubakov — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:11:59 -0000

@6e6b8ae652d24db07b1d5e2b0249ece7 It's our own builds panel. We use Jenkins API to create it.

Re: Blue Builds

zozozander — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:53:17 -0000

What is this graphic taken from some type of build tool?

Re: 2 of our servers are down since 1 AM EST

Michael Dubakov — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:02:04 -0000

Tim Friesen GoGrid looks interesting. We will check it. Thanks!

Re: 2 of our servers are down since 1 AM EST

Michael Dubakov — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:39:42 -0000

@Ilja We tried Amazon as well before Rackspace. And we encountered 5 days (!) outage during this trial. Then we tried it again and had 1 day outage. Maybe we are just unlucky, but then we switched to Atum.com, they were very responsive and solved issues quickly. This is the first large downtime in fact.

Re: 2 of our servers are down since 1 AM EST

Tim Friesen — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:12:50 -0000

We are successfully using GoGrid (San Francisco) to host one dedicated server and one virtual server. We are also using iWeb (Montreal, Canada) for hosting a dedicated server. We have had good success with both.